Was the Oregon Standoff Planned or Did Agenda 21 Just Receive a Boost?
Truth and Art TV article
Contributed by Bernie Suarez
Now that the Oregon standoff is done with FBI and the mainstream media preparing to give us their facts and analysis of the situation, let's all step back and ask some basic questions about what just happened.
First, I have a simple process by which I judge mainstream media news. I've discussed these steps over the years. It starts by understanding their history, ownership and allegiance to state propaganda. Then it's a good thing to observe how their stories empower the state and strip the individual of all rights. This latest episode of the East Oregon standoff is not different.
In today's circus mainstream media news that only serves the purpose of the state, we need to examine the timing of the Oregon standoff with a uniquely critical eye. This recent standoff involved Ammon Bundy and supporters taking a stand in defense of the Hammond family ranch and fellow activists who had been convicted of arson, and who felt they had been treated harshly and unfairly by the federal government land grabbers. Bundy expressed his conviction over the purpose of the standoff implying his purpose was divine and that he was following what “the Lord” impressed upon him to do. This is a very important piece of the puzzle as we'll see in a bit.
Am I saying this entire event was staged? Not at all, but I am saying that the timing of the story fits in perfectly with the overall agenda to demonize freedom lovers, Constitution lovers, independent thinkers and even faith based Christians who may not quite want to go along with a bully federal government, tyranny, Agenda 21 land-grab rulings, legislation and forced selling of land.
Some of the components and the timing of the Oregon standoff must leave us all wondering if this story conveniently fell into the lap of the establishment as a result of the runaway tyranny we are under, or if it was somehow planned. Until proven otherwise, I'm leaning toward the possibilities that this event evolved out of frustration with the federal government but I'm still open to both possibilities.
First of all, there is an agenda playing out throughout the United States to restructure local ordinances and legislation pertaining to “preserving” certain lands while “developing” others. Federal government takeover of rural land is at the center of this agenda. This agenda is slowly but surely looking to limit land ownership in rural areas, bully Americans out of their lands, and force more and more Americans into urban areas. This is also a war against the individual that is only getting worse.
Whenever the people unite against the state and its enforcement arm there is always some degree of genuineness by the people involved at the ground level because these actions appeal to the call and desire to be free from state oppression. We saw this phenomenon at the Occupy revolution where many well-meaning activists took to the streets to express their frustration and anger with the control system.
So as we speculate about what just happened in Oregon, and now that the standoff has ended with one person killed, let us step back and observe a few things that came out of all of this.
Notice how almost every outcome of this event empowers the state and this is the point we should be taking notice of and wondering about.
1- The Oregon standoff provided the mainstream media a chance to demonize patriots and freedom lovers and paint them out to be possible violent extremists.
2- The standoff provided a chance to show America, this is what happens to anyone who resists BLM and federal land grabs.
3- It provided an opportunity to associate “armed militia” with patriotism and violent and dangerous rebels.
4- It provided a chance to show the public that people may be shot and killed at standoffs involving “patriotism”, people's rights, dispute over land or land takeovers.
5- The standoff even provided a conditioning period where pundits in the media and social media were allowed to express and wish death and destruction to those involved just like we saw in the Bundy Ranch standoff in 2015.
6- Also quietly unnoticed is that the standoff provided a chance to portray faith-based Christians as potentially radical domestic extremists. Believing in god's will, acting on faith and speaking peacefully about the desire to exert one's rights just absorbed a kick in the face at the hands of big government. This was a big step in the slow but sure radicalization of well meaning Christians or any faith-based people (as we've seen with the demonization of Muslims) who resist the federal government to be portrayed as radical or “extremists”.
And let's not forget the mainstream media's opportunistic almost surreal propaganda attempt to link ISIS to the Oregon standoff earlier in January 2016. If nothing else this proves that the mass media was determined to cash in on this event and spin it to their advantage one way or another like they did with the Bundy Ranch standoff in 2015.
One could speculate whether ultimately this event was engineered in some way or orchestrated for political reasons. In today's crazy crisis-actor news world where everything is staged for political reasons, the astute truth seeker should at least deeply speculate what just happened and wonder where this narrative is going next.
Remember, it only takes one effective event to scare everyone off into submitting to the federal government Agenda 21 U.N. plans and expand their power. In a world of engineered news and propaganda where all mass media controlled news is designed to support the new world order plans, we must at least admit this latest “standoff” did very little to raise people's hopes and promote liberty and perhaps that was the purpose.
That leads to a few final questions:
1- Was this standoff the last hope for Americans to take a stand against the federal government bullies imposing Agenda 21 land grabs?
2- Will another event occur to rekindle the hope that the people should and do have a voice and a say over the land they live in?
Here's a question no one is asking.
3- Why didn't Sheriff Ward stand strong within his jurisdiction and firmly tell the Feds to go away? Is this the real story here? Should we ignore that the Sheriff's wife had her tires slashed and that he may have been pressured even intimidated by the federal mafia to back down?
This is where the rubber meets the road and jurisdiction disputes such as these are at the heart of the Agenda 21 plans, as the new world order continues to emerge.
Ultimately the ramifications of this standoff will play out. In the meantime, let's make sure we continue to ask all the right questions and keep all the critical issues in the right perspective. There is a right way and a wrong way to resist and perhaps this was a well intended wrong way, perhaps the Bundy's were set up, or perhaps this was by design.
Creator of Truth and Art TV Project